Table 4. Analysis of the accuracy of the obtained ratios in determine Erlenmeyer flask deformity.
Ratio | Accuracy (95% CI) |
2 cm:base (cut-point=0.70) | Sensitivity 88.9% (70.8%, 97.6%) |
Specificity 91.9% (78.1%, 98.3%) | |
PPV 88.9% (70.8%, 97.6%) | |
NPV 91.9% (78.1%, 98.3%) | |
Correct 90.6% (80.7%, 96.5%) | |
4 cm:base (cut-point=0.58) | Sensitivity 95.6% (75.7%, 99.1%) |
Specificity 100.0% (90.5%, 100.0%) | |
PPV 100.0% (86.3%, 100.0%) | |
NPV 94.9% (82.7%, 99.4%) | |
Correct 96.9% (89.2%, 99.6%) | |
6 cm:base (cut-point=0.54) | Sensitivity 88.9% (70.8%, 97.6%) |
Specificity 97.3% (85.8%, 99.9%) | |
PPV 96.0% (79.6%, 99.9%) | |
NPV 92.3% (79.1%, 98.4%) | |
Correct 93.8% (84.8%, 98.3%) |
NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.