Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2011 Aug 30;8(5):591–600. doi: 10.1177/1740774511419683

Table 2.

The association of study chair responses on trial design factors and accrual sufficiency status

Overall, % (n=110) By trial accrual status, %

Sufficient (n=75) Insufficient (n=35) p-value

Time elapsed from trial concept introduction to trial activation
≤12 mos 43 45 37
>12 - ≤ 24 mos 40 41 37
>24 - ≤ 36 mos 11 7 20
> 36 mos 6 7 6 0.11

Perception of eligibility criteria
Appropriate 86 88 83
Overly restrictive 13 11 17
Overly permissive 1 1 0 0.54

Therapeutic trials only, % (n= 86) By trial accrual status, %

Sufficient (n= 60) Insufficient (n= 26) p-value

Use of placebo, observation, or non-treatment control arm reported
Yes 31 27 42
No 69 73 58 0.15

Best descriptor of treatments compared in trial
Novel therapy vs established therapy 65 70 54
Two or more novel therapies 8 7 11
Head-to-head comparison of well-established therapies 27 23 35 0.36