Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2012 Nov;33(6):731–744. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825aecad

Table 5.

Post hoc comparison (Tukey HSD) of noise masker types (Noise) indicates significant differences in speech recognition performance in LTASS versus modulated LTASS (modLTASS) noise as a function of reverberation condition and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Performance in the pseudo-anechoic (PA) condition, reverberant condition at a 2 m distance (R2m) and reverberant condition at a 6 m distance (R6m) were compared at −10, −5, and 0 dB SNR.

Noise Reverberation Condition
PA R2m R6m
SNR (dB) SNR (dB) SNR (dB)
−10 −5 0 −10 −5 0 −10 −5 0
LTASS modLTASS

Significant at p < 0.01

Significant at p < 0.001