Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 30;31(48):17572–17582. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4236-11.2011

Table 1.

Behavioral ANOVA results

Effect Draws
Accuracy
Participants Ideal observer Participants Ideal observer
Probability F(1,16) = 6.82, p = 0.02 F(1,16) = 336.16, p < 0.01 F(1,16) = 5.01, p = 0.01 F(1,16) = 97.83, p < 0.01
Loss F(1,16) = 20.79, p < 0.01 F(1,16) = 515.86, p < 0.01 n.s. F(1,16) = 58.96, p < 0.01
Probability × loss n.s. F(1,16) = 28.90, p < 0.01 F(1,16) = 4.54, p = 0.05 F(1,16) = 13.39, p < 0.01
Comparison of agent type (human vs ideal observer)
    Agent type F(1,16) = 50.84, p < 0.01 F(1,16) = 107.64, p < 0.01
    Agent type × probability F(1,16) = 24.84, p < 0.01 n.s.
    Agent type × loss n.s. p = 0.07 F(1,16) = 14.55, p < 0.01
    Agent type × probability × loss F(1,16) = 6.61, p = 0.02 F(1,16) = 18.64, p < 0.01

n.s., Not significant.