Table 7.
Author | Aim | Patients | Compliance results |
---|---|---|---|
Vandal 1999[20] |
To report the observed difference between two measures of compliance: interview and a compliometer. |
40 female patients with AIS aged 10–16 years |
Compliance measured with interview: 82.5%, compliometer: average compliance 33% |
Havey 2002[21] |
To develop and test the reliability of a device (pressure sensor) for the objective measurement of spinal orthosis wearing time. |
9 normal volunteers |
Compliance with brace- wearing can be accurately measured by an electronic device embedded in the orthosis. |
Nicholson 2003[12] |
To develop instrumentation for discrete, reliable and objective measurement of brace usage patterns. |
10 female pts with AIS (mean age 15) |
Effective compliance: 65% (range 8%-90%) patients generally overestimated their time in brace. |
Takemitsu 2004[23] |
To evaluate objectively idiopathic scoliosis patients’ compliance with Wilmington brace treatment. |
61 pts with AIS (mean age 12 range 6–16 years) |
Average compliance was 75%, age related. |
Rahman 2005[22] |
To evaluate the efficacy of brace treatment prospectively using an objective measure of compliance. |
34 pts average age 12 (range 10–16 years) |
The compliance rate of the group whose curvatures did not progress was 85 + −18,5%; that of the group whose curvatures progressed was 62 + −24,3%. |
Helfenstein 2006[24] |
To establish new technical methods for the objective measurement of brace usage without patients’ involvement. |
9 female patients with AIS |
68% range 19%- 97%. No patient reached the recommended 23-hour bracing. |
Morton 2008[19] |
Testing prediction and estimation of adherence compared to the objective measures of compliance. |
124 pts with AIS |
Actual average of adherence was 47%. Physicians, orthotists, parents and patients respectively overestimated brace wear as 64%, 66%, 72% and 75%. |
Rahman 2010[37] |
To demonstrate the efficacy of using a new electronic brace compliance monitor. |
10 AIS pts in Wilmington brace treatment |
Patient compliance 78%. The cricket is a reliable accurate and sensitive device to determine compliance. |
Katz 2010[26] |
To measure accurately the number of hours of brace to determine if increased wear correlate with lack of progression. |
100 pts in Boston brace therapy for AIS |
the total number of hours of brace wear in patients who didn’t undergo surgery had a mean compliance of 42.4% a mean compliance of 24.4% in the group of patients needing for surgical treatment. |
Muller 2011[27] | To objectify the impact of spinal bracing on daily step activity in AIS and adolescent kyphosis patients receiving conservative treatment with CTM brace and a kyphosis brace. | 38 AIS patients and 10 AK patients using an ankle monitor for recording gait cycles and a temperature sensor to determine brace wear time. | The overall compliance rate was 72.7 + − 27.6%, based on the 23-hour recommended wearing time. |
Literature compliance results. AIS: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.