Table 3.
Slopes of regression lines for plots of corrected versus uncorrected pairwise distances
| All accessions | No non- Pinus outgroups | Subgenus Pinus | Subgenus Strobus | section Q uinquefoliae + P. monophylla | section Pinus + P. ponderosa | section Trifoliae + P. thunbergii | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full alignment |
0.9574 |
0.9682 |
0.9898 |
0.9893 |
0.9905 |
0.9925 |
0.9928 |
| (0.9571-0.9577) |
(0.9681-0.9683) |
(0.9895-0.9898) |
(0.9888-0.9898) |
(0.9893-0.9918) |
(0.9911-0.9939) |
(0.9921-0.9935) |
|
| A136665 |
0.9604 |
0.9851 |
0.9935 |
0.9903 |
0.9916 |
0.9941 |
0.9948 |
| |
(0.9601-0.9607) |
(0.9850-0.9853) |
(0.9929-0.9941) |
(0.9897-0.9908) |
(0.9903-0.9928) |
(0.9923-0.9958) |
(0.9939-0.9958) |
| A133065 |
0.9655 |
0.9954 |
0.9959 |
0.9950 |
0.9952 |
0.9955 |
0.9961 |
| (0.9653-0.9656) | (0.9950-0.9958) | (0.9953-0.9964) | (0.9938-0.9962) | (0.9932-0.9972) | (0.9935-0.9976) | (0.9953-0.9969) |
95% confidence intervals for slopes are shown in parentheses. Slopes with values below 1.0 represent increased levels of saturation in the alignment tested. Intercepts of all lines were significantly different than zero at p < ≤0, with the exception of section Pinus + P. ponderosa for treatment A133065, which was not significantly different than zero. 95% confidence intervals for intercepts significantly different than zero were all 1.8 × 10-6 ≤ y ≤ 0.00040.