Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jul 4;200(2-3):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.025

Table 2.

Pearson intercorrelations between baseline neurocognitive, social cognitive and symptom severity measures and change in objective QOL and subjective SWL, from study entry to termination of rehabilitation interventions (n=30–44).

Variable 1. Vocab 2. PCPT Eff 3. CVLT T1 4. CVLT T5 5. PCET Errors 6. Processing Speed Index 7. Penn Emotional Acuity Test 8. Objective QOL change 9. Subjective SWL Change 10. Positive
Neurocognitive
1. Vocab (WAIS) - - - - - - - -
2. PCPT Eff 0.00 - - - - - - - - -
3. CVLT T1 0.28 0.19 - - - - - - - -
4. CVLT T5 0.12 −0.09 0.49** - - - - - - -
5. PCET Errors 0.31* 0.15 0.03 0.02 - - - - - -
6. Processing Speed Index(WAIS) 0.12 −0.05 0.09 0.22 0.08 - - - - -
Social Cognitive
7. Penn Emotional Acuity Test 0.04 0.13 0.32 0.36 0.22 0.13 - - - -
Outcome
8. Objective QOL change 0.14 −0.28 0.38* 0.28 −0.15 0.17 0.36* - - -
9. Subjective SWL change 0.35* −0.11 0.42* 0.15 −0.07 0.14 0.27 0.53** - -
Symptoms
10. Positive 0.12 0.09 0.15 −0.13 0.14 0.07 0.06 0.14 0.02 -
11. Negative 0.30 0.38** 0.06 −0.05 0.34* 0.41** 0.34 −0.12 −0.03 0.09