Table 1.
post-hoc t-tests
| M | t | df | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Alpha |
1PP-active vs. 1PP-passive |
−0.12 |
−1.96 |
18 |
>0.05 |
| |
3PP-active vs. 3PP-passive |
−0.17 |
−2.38 |
18 |
<0.05* |
| |
1PP-active vs. 3PP-active |
0.00 |
−1.28 |
18 |
>0.05 |
| |
1PP-passive vs. 3PP-passive |
−0.05 |
−2.82 |
18 |
<0.05* |
|
Theta |
1PP-active vs. 1PP-passive |
0.05 |
2.80 |
18 |
<0.05* |
| |
3PP-active vs. 3PP-passive |
0.03 |
1.85 |
18 |
>0.05 |
| |
1PP-active vs. 3PP-active |
0.00 |
−0.41 |
18 |
>0.05 |
| 1PP-passive vs. 3PP-passive | −0.03 | −1.72 | 18 | >0.05 |
Summarized are the results of the post-hoc t-tests between the four conditions separately for alpha and theta. The results were considered significant in case of p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons.