Skip to main content
. 1998 Dec;118(4):1487–1494. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.4.1487

Table I.

Comparison of the effects of a range of protease inhibitors on the activity of purified soybean Ser protease in vitro and on the oxidative burst in vivo

Inhibitor Protease Activity
Oxidative Burst
Inhibitor concentration Protease activity Control Yeast elicitor
μm % μm H2O2
Control (DMSO) 0 100 0.00  ± 0.10 2.10  ± 0.44
Antipain 20 0 4.55  ± 0.43 13.2  ± 1.17
DCIa 1000 26 1.03  ± 0.27 12.4  ± 1.49
DFP 1000 2 1.34  ± 0.17 9.46  ± 1.03
Leupeptin 15 0 0.13  ± 0.11 5.90  ± 0.34
PMSF 1000 81 0.11  ± 0.06 12.4  ± 1.41
TLCKb 1000 61 0.10  ± 0.13 3.52  ± 0.22
TPCKc 1000 47 5.86  ± 0.60 8.90  ± 1.07

Concentrations of inhibitors used in vitro are given. Inhibitors were applied to cells at a final concentration of 0.5 mm (0.2 mm for antipain), and H2O2 was measured 2 h after exposure to water (control) or yeast elicitor (200 μg Glc equivalents mL−1). Results show the average ± sd from three independent experiments.

a

DCI, 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin. 

b

TLCK, Nα-p-tosyl-l-lysine chloromethyl ketone. 

c

TPCK, n-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone.