Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Cell. 2009 Oct 30;9(1):92–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00533.x

Table 1.

Absence of correlation between lifespan under dietary restriction (DR) and lifespan, food consumption, fertility and ethanol sensitivity under ad libitum (AL) feeding.f

AL
lifespana
AL
food intakeb
AL
fertilityc
AL
fertilityd
AL
LORRe
DR
lifespana
Males r = 0.09
p = 0.56
r = −0.02
p = 0.91
r = 0.21
p = 0.19
r = −0.21
p = 0.19
r = 0.13
p = 0.39
Females r = −0.03
p = 0.86
r = 0.30
p = 0.06
r = 0.18
p = 0.27
r = −0.12
p = 0.48
a

Strain-specific mean lifespan (days).

b

The food intake (g/mouse/day) was measured on a weekly basis. The values are the average of food intake from 3–5 months to 12 months of age.

c

Fertility (litter size) was measured in the generation of mice preceding the lifespan cohort and defined as the average litter size of the first three litters.

d

Fertility (litter/female) defined as the average number of litters per strain.

e

The sedative-hypnotic response to a high-dose, intraperitoneal injection of ethanol, defined as time to regain loss of righting reflex (LORR). The LORR data are from Bennett et al., 2006.

f

The p values of the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) are all from 2-tailed tests.