Skip to main content
. 2012 May 24;10:106. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-106

Table 1.

Correlation between AZGP1 expression and clinical and pathological characters in HCC

Variable
AZGP1 protein
  All cases Low expression High expression χ2 P valueα
Age(years) b
 
 
 
0.134
0.714
  48
119
46 (38.7)
73 (61.3)
 
 
  ≥ 48
127
52 (40.9)
75 (59.1)
 
 
Mean ± SD(47.9 ± 11.8)
 
 
 
 
 
Gender
 
 
 
0.099
0.753
  Female
27
10 (37.0)
17(63.0)
 
 
  Male
219
88(40.2)
131(59.8)
 
 
HBsAg
 
 
 
0.673
0.412
  Yes
213
87 (40.8)
126 (59.2)
 
 
  No
33
11(33.3)
22 (66.7)
 
 
AFP (ng/ml)
 
 
 
6.182
0.013
  ≤ 20
104
32 (30.8)
72 (69.2)
 
 
  > 20
142
66 (46.5)
76 (53.5)
 
 
Liver cirrhosis
 
 
 
9.244
0.002
  Yes
177
81 (45.8)
96 (54.2)
 
 
  No
69
17 (24.6)
52 (75.4)
 
 
Tumor size (cm)
 
 
 
0.457
0.499
  ≤ 5
127
48 (37.8)
79 (62.2)
 
 
  > 5
119
50 (42.0)
69 (58.0)
 
 
Tumor multiplicity
 
 
 
0.042
0.837
  Single
130
51 (39.2)
79 (60.8)
 
 
  Multiple
116
47 (40.5)
69 (59.5)
 
 
Tumor differentiation
 
 
 
9.347
0.025
  Well (I)
33
6 (18.2)
27 (81.8)
 
 
  Moderate (II)
125
54 (43.2)
71 (56.8)
 
 
  Poor (III)
76
35 (46.1)
41 (53.9)
 
 
Undifferentiation (IV)
12
3 (25)
9 (75)
 
 
Clinical Stage
 
 
 
2.154
0.541
  I
16
5 (31.3)
11 (68.7)
 
 
  II
93
33 (35.5)
60 (61.5)
 
 
  III
106
46 (43.4)
60 (56.6)
 
 
  IV
31
14 (45.2)
17 (54.8)
 
 
Vascular invasion
 
 
 
1.966
0.161
  Yes
73
34 (46.6)
39 (53.4)
 
 
  No 173 64 (37.0) 109 (63.0)    

αChi-square test; b patients were divided according to the median age; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; AZGP1, zinc-alpha2-glycoprotein.