Table 1.
Date | Study | Context | L | N | Age | Type | Stage | Uniqueness of study | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 2004 |
Extermann M et al.[12] |
Single center pilot study assessing role of CGA in oncological treatment. |
3 |
15 |
≥70 |
Breast |
55% Stage I, 45% Stage II |
QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast tool. Functional status was assessed by ADL, IADL, ECOG-PS, GDS, MNA, Charlson Comorbidity Index, CIRS-G. |
CGA with follow-up can extend quality of life in these patients from treatment and prognostic aspects. |
Nov 2005 |
Hurria A et al.[13] |
Feasibility study concerning a cancer-specific CGA. |
3 |
43 |
≥65 |
25% breast, 18% CRC, 38% lung, 20% lymphoma |
5% Stage 1, 10% Stage II, 18% Stage III, 68% Stage IV |
Specifies use of ADL, IADL, KPS, Timed Up and Go, BOMC, HADS, MOS, Seeman and Berkman Social Ties, BMI, % unintentional weight loss in the last six months in a CGA that is specific for cancer. Specifies ethnicity of participants as 90% white, 10% black. |
The cancer-specific CGA can be completed by the majority of patients to provide reliable and valid results. |
Dec 2006 |
Pope, D et al.[14] |
Study of Geriatric Assessment in older patients with operable cancer. |
3 |
460 |
>70 |
216 breast, 146 GIT, 71 GUT, 27 other |
For breast cancer: 48% Stage 1, 39.3% Stage 2, 12.7% Stage 3. |
Specified use of PACE, an advanced form of CGA using BFI, ECOG-PS, IADL, GDS, MMSE, ASA and SIC. |
Geriatric Assessments can be a useful tool in evaluating fitness for surgery in the older cancer patient. |
Jan 2008 |
Albrand, G and Terret, C [15] |
Single-center review of assessment of breast cancer in the older. |
3 |
76 |
>70 |
Breast |
Primary |
Specific for breast cancer. Specifies use of CIRS-G score as part of CGA. |
CGA should be performed before any treatment decisions are made. More trials need to be conducted involving older patients, to determine efficacy of chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients. |
March 2010 |
Gironés, R et al.[16] |
Single-center experience of use of CGA for breast cancer patients. |
3 |
91 |
>70 |
Breast |
26% Stage I, 58% Stage II, 16% Stage III |
Specific for breast cancer, specifying use of ADL, IADL, ECOG PS, GDS, Charlson comorbidity index, BMI, Balducci criteria for frailty in CGA. |
Function and independence in older breast cancer patients with co-morbidities can be preserved by use of CGA. CGA is often too time consuming to be practically assessed in an oncology setting. |
Jul 2010 |
Molina- Garrido, M and Guillén-Ponce, C [17] |
Single center comparison of two frailty screening tools and CGA. |
3 |
41 |
≥65 |
Breast |
53.7% Stage I, 41.5% Stage II, 2.4% Stage III, 2.4% Stage IV |
Specific for breast cancer. Specifies use of ADL, IADL, Charlson comorbidity index, Pfeiffer test for cognition and NSI. |
Patients who had a score indicative of frailty had scores in CGA suggesting poorer physical function, malnutrition and cognition. |
Jul 2011 |
Barthélémy, P et al.[18] |
Single center retrospective review of recommendation of adjuvant chemotherapy to older breast cancer patients |
3 |
192 |
>70 |
Breast |
Primary |
Specific for primary breast cancer only. Specifies use of ADL, IADL, ECOG PS, GDS, BMI, MNA, CIRS-G. |
Some components of CGA may be able to determine its use in predictability of chemotherapy use. |
Jul 2011 |
Lazarovici, C et al.[19] |
Single center investigation into what components of CGA correlate to need for geriatric referral within older cancer patients |
3 |
65 |
≥71 |
Breast (29%), lung (24.6%), colorectal (7.6%) |
60% had metastatic disease |
Specifies use of ADL, IADL, MMSE, BMI, CIRS-G |
Patients who had CGA before they had made their cancer treatment decision were more likely to receive an altered treatment plan. |
Aug 2011 | Hurria, A et al.[20] | A multicenter trial to assess use of CGA in determining chemotherapy toxicity in older cancer patients | 3 | 700 | ≥65 | Lung (29%), GI (27%), gynaecological (17%), breast (11%), genitourinary (10%), or other (6%) | 5% Stage I, 12% Stage II, 22% Stage III, 61% Stage IV | Same CGA format used in previous study by Hurria et al.[13] | Some components of the CGA can be used to assess potential toxicity of chemotherapy in this group of older cancer patients. |
ADL, Activities of Daily Living; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory; BMI, Body Mass Index; BOMC, Blessed-Orientation Memory Concentration test; CGA, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; CIRS-G, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale – Geriatrics; CRC, Colorectal cancer; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; GIT, Gastro-intestinal Tract; GUM, Genito-urinary Tract; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HHC, Home Health Care; IADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; L, Level of evidence; MMSE, Mini-mental state examination; MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment; MOS, Medical Outcomes Study; N, Number of patients; NCI, National Cancer Institute; NIA, National Institute on Aging; NSI, Nutrition Screening Initiative; PACE, Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the older; QOL, Quality of Life; SIC, Satariano’s Index of Co-morbidities.