Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 19;7(10):e46912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046912

Table 1. Genotype information and quality control statistics for the 9 obesity-susceptibility variants included in the study.

SNP Chrom. Position Nearest gene Effect allele Effect allele Other allele References Call rate Genotype freq HWE
frequency Risk allele homozygous Heterozygous Other allele homo p-value
% % % %
rs2815752 1 72585028 NEGR1 A 59.2 G 1,6 99.7 34.5 49.3 16.2 0.525
rs6548238 2 624905 TMEM18 C 83.7 T 1,6 99.4 69.9 27.5 2.6 0.669
rs10938397 4 44877284 GNPDA2 G 38.8 A 1,6 99.4 15.2 47.3 37.6 0.765
rs987237 6 50911009 TFAP2B G 17.7 A 9 98.4 3.3 28.8 67.9 0.745
rs10838738 11 47619625 MTCH2 G 36.3 A 1,6 99.6 13.9 44.7 41.4 0.221
rs4074134 11 27603861 BDNF G 81.5 A 7,8 99.7 66.4 30.2 3.4 0.752
rs1121980 16 52366748 In FTO A 44.4 G 1,3 99.7 18.9 51.0 30.1 0.139
rs17782313 18 56002077 MC4R C 26.9 T 4 98.4 6.7 40.4 52.9 0.203
rs11084753 19 39013977 KCTD15 G 69.5 A 1,6 99.2 47.6 43.7 8.7 0.181

Article reference: 1) Loos et al., 2009; 2) Hinney et al., 2007; 3) Loos et al., 2008; 4) Willer et al., 2009; 5) Zhao et al., 2009; 6) Thorleifson et al., 2009;

HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; Call-rate: rate of successful genotyping. All variants passed initial quality-control criteria with a call-rate ≥95% and genotype distribution were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). The genotype distribution and effect allele frequencies varied from 17.7% for rs987237 to 83.7% for rs654238), which were in consistency with previous reports.