Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 19;7(10):e47602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047602

Figure 4. Structure diagram showing most likely number of clusters, K = 5.

Figure 4

Cluster membership was as follows: Cluster 1- Durango, Fruita, Grand Junction, Mack; Cluster 2– Lamar; Cluster 3– Fountain; Cluster 4– Denver; Cluster 5– Evans, Fort Collins, Loveland, Platteville. Pueblo and Sterling appear highly admixed. The program was run with the default parameters, (i.e. excluding population information) using a panel of 14 microsatellites.