Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 19;7(10):e47235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047235

Table 2. Calculated Kds and derived ΔG° (Gibbs free energy of binding) for the interactions between eIF4E and the N-Cap derivative peptides.

Peptide Sequence SPR derived Kd (nM) (ΔG°, cal mol−1)
Keq Kkin Keq derived Kkin derived
eIF4G1 1KKRYDREFLLGF12 580.2±16.7 523.9±61.6 −8500±20 −8550±70
eIF4E-D5S 1KKRYSREFLLGF12 103.0±2.3 99.9±6.2 −9520±10 −9540±40
eIF4E-D5T 1KKRYTREFLLGF12 110.2±1.8 104.9±7.2 −9480±10 −9510±40
eIF4E-D5G 1KKRYGREFLLGF12 467.8±28.1 439.5±26.0 −8630±40 −8660±40
eIF4E-D5P 1KKRYPREFLLGF12 683.7±13.6 717.3±31.2 −8400±10 −8370±100
eIF4E-D5N 1KKRYNREFLLGF12 444.5±1.6 388.9±1.6 −8660±10 −8740±10
eIF4E-D5E 1KKRYEREFLLGF12 749.0±57.7 692.4±31.2 −8350±50 −8390±30
eIF4E-D5C 1KKRYCREFLLGF12 436.5±6.4 458.0±19.8 −8670±10 −8640±30

The table shows the peptide sequences used to study the influence of alternative residues and their effects in capping the first turn of the α-helix when bound to eIF4E. Kds were determined using SPR with eIF4E immobilized on the chip surface. Kds were derived from the equilibrium responses (Keq) and from the association and dissociation phases (Kkin) of the SPR data. The Gibbs free energy of binding (ΔG°) was calculated with the equation ΔG = –RT ln Ka using both dissociation constant values determined.