Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 17;84(4):e475–e481. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.003

Table 3.

Treatment Efficacy by Dose Level

Patient Dose
Level
Best
RECIST
Response on
study
Baseline
primary tumor
diameter
(cm) *
Max %
change in
primary
tumor
Best CA19-9
response on
study
hRRM1
Max
Change
hRRM2
Max
Change
Time to 1st

progression
(months)a
OS
(months)
Post-study
therapy
(Yes/No)
1 1 PR 2.8 46% ↓ NEb NAc NAc 4.9 18.6 Yes
2 1 PD 4.5 No change NE NAc 12% ↓e 2 6.1 Yes
3 1 PD 5.6 16% ↑ NE No change 6% ↓ 0.8 2.8 Yes
4 1 SDd 2.2 25% ↓ 56% ↓ 12% ↑e 8% ↑e 8.4 14.6 Yesf
5 2 SD 2.1 No change 21% ↓ 13% ↑e 7% ↑e 7.5 9.1 Yes
6 2 PD 5.1 18% ↓ NE 13% ↑ No change 2.1 6.7 Yes
7 2 SD 3.4 12% ↓ 68% ↓ 3% ↓e 14% ↓e 10.2 11.6 Yes
8 3 PR 6.1 38% ↓ 62% ↓ 9% ↓e 4% ↓e 6.8 6.8 Yes
9 3 PD 4.3 13% ↓ NE 3% ↓ 3% ↓ 0.8 1 No
10 3 SD 3.8 5% ↓ 147% ↑ 4% ↓ 15% ↑ 6.3 6.3 No
11 3 SD 3.8 12% ↓ 47% ↓ 7% ↓e 9% ↓e 6.1 6.1 Yes
12 3 SD 4.6 22% ↓ 360% ↑ 16% ↓e 15% ↓e 4.4 9.4 Yes
*

Denotes longest cross-sectional diameter

a

Includes post-study therapy

b

NE: not evaluable- data not available (N=3) or CA 19-9 not elevated (N=1)

c

Data not available

d

Patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy post-study

e

Indicates complete (Day 1 and Day 33) data available

f

Patient received adjuvant therapy and subsequent treatment for metastatic disease