Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;66(3):257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.10.009

Table 3.

Comparison of the prevalences of ring/tramline opacities in 59 inpatients with and without (1) a chronic cough, (2) a cough productive of sputum, (3) progressive dyspnoea, (4) a primary respiratory cause for admission and (5) a history of treatment with HAART

Clinical feature present Clinical feature absent p-value
Cough (n = 16) 11/16 (69%) 25/43 (58%) 0.46
Productive cough (n = 8) 5/8 (62%) 31/51 (61%) 0.93
Progressive dyspnoea (n = 31) 21/31 (68%) 15/28 (54%) 0.27
Respiratory admission (n = 36) 21/36 (58%) 15/23 (65%) 0.60
HAART therapy (n = 21) 12/21 (57%) 24/38 (63%) 0.65

The table describes the prevalence of ring/tramline opacities in patients with and without specific clinical features; for example, ring/tramline opacities were present in 11/16 (69%) patients with a chronic cough but also in 25/43 (58%) patients without a chronic cough. HAART, highly-active antiretroviral therapy.