Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):509–517. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265f08d

Table 2.

Surgical/pathology findings.

Characteristic Number (%)
IMAGE NEG IMAGE POS significance
Patient number 58 117
PET found at surgery 57 (98%) 106 (90.5%) 0.059
Primary PET location (surgery)
 Location
  Pancreas 9 (15.5%) 35 (30%) 0.039
  Duodenum 37 (64%) 43 (37%) 0.0008
  Lymph node (a) 7 (12%)(a) 13 (11%)(a) 0.85
  Other(b) 0 (0%) 13 (10.2%)(b) 0.008
  Unknown(c) 5 (8.6%)(c) 24 (20.5%)(c) 0.047
  >1 primary tumor 0 (0%) 7 (6%) 0.0036
 Primary tumor size (cm)
  Mean ± SEM 1.09 ± 0.09 1.9 ± 0.2 <0.01
  [range] [0.2-3] [0.4-8]
  ≤ 1 cm 36 (62%) 24 (20.5%) <0.00001
  ≥3 cm 1 (1.7%) 21 (18%) 0.0024
Tumor extent at surgery
  Primary only 28 (54%) 45 (38%) 0.21
  Primary plus lymph node involvement 20 (34%) 51 (44%) 0.25
  With liver involvement ± lymph node involvement 4 (6.8%) 9 (7.7%) 0.83
  Lymph node metastases only 4 (6.8%) 11 (9.4%) 0.57
(a)

Primary lymph node gastrinoma was defined as previously reported and included a patient in which only lymph nodes (s) were removed who had normal fasting gastrin levels, secretin test result, and imaging postoperatively. (see reference 46)

(b)

Other primary locations includes in the imaging positive group 13 patients with primary tumors in: ovary (n=1),; liver (n=4); pylorus (n=2); heart (n=1); common bile duct (n=2); omentum (n=2); lung cancer (n=1) .

(c)

Unknown includes in the imaging negative and positive groups, respectively: 4 and 11 patients with only lymph node metastases; 0 and 2 patients) with only liver metastases, found determined as described in Methods and 1 and 11 patients with no tumor found.