Table 5.
% Survival [95 % CI](1) | |||
---|---|---|---|
A. Imaging Negative (n=58) ((2),(4)) | 5 yrs | 10yrs | 20 yrs |
Total survival | 90 [78-96] |
82 [68-91] |
71 [51-83] |
Disease-related survival | 98 [83-99] |
93 [79-98] |
88 [71-96] |
B. Imaging positive (n=117) ((3),(4)) | |||
Total survival | 86 [77-91] |
74 [64-81] |
58 [46-68] |
Disease-related survival | 91 [84-95] |
85 [76-91] |
73 [58-83] |
Percentage survival from surgery calculated from data from 58 patients with negative imaging preoperatively and 117 patients with positive imaging from survival curves shown in Fig. 2.
For the Imaging Negative patients during the followup (9.5 ± 0.72 [range-0.1-21.8 yrs] from surgery, 11 patients died from any cause (overall survival)(Fig.1) and 4 died from a Disease-related cause (Fig. 1).
For the Imaging Positive patients during the followup (11.6 ± 0.6 [range-0.1-28.1 yrs] from surgery, 38 patients died from any cause (overall survival)(Fig.1) and 20 died from a Disease-related cause (Fig. 1).
The differences between the Overall survival and Disease-related survival were not significant (p=0.069, HR-2.56, 95 CI-0.92-7.1) for theImage Negative patients. Howcver, they were significantly (p=0.015, HR-1.93, 95 CI-1.14-3.2) different from the Image positive patients