Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;102(11):2135–2140. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300664

TABLE 2—

Correlates of Survey Participants’ Awareness of New Jersey’s HIV Exposure Law: March–October, 2010

Variable Aware,a No. (%) or Mean ±SD Unaware,b No. (%) or Mean ±SD Cross-Group Comparison
Sexually abstinent for the past y 72 (44) 91 (56) χ2(df = 1) = 4.53; P = .03
In compliance with the lawc 195 (83) 189 (84) χ2(df = 1) = 0.035; P = .85
Sexually active and in compliance with the law 123 (76) 98 (73) χ2(df = 1) = 0.054; P = .82
Perceived responsibility for HIV preventiond χ2(df = 1) = 1.08; P = .87
 More for PLWH 108 (45) 110 (47)
 Equal 111 (46) 96 (41)
 More for HIV-negative persons 23 (10) 26 (11)
 HIV-related stigmae 1.86 ±0.38 2.02 ±0.42 z = –3.68; P < .001
 Societal hostilitye 2.67 ±0.42 2.77 ±0.40 z = –2.06; P = .04
 Comfort with disclosuree 2.43 ±0.60 2.70 ±0.58 z = –4.79; P < .001

Note. PLWH = persons living with HIV. Totals may not add up to 100% because of rounding.

a

The sample size was n = 244 (51%).

b

The sample size was n = 235 (49%).

c

Defined as reporting having been sexually abstinent for the past year or having disclosed positive serostatus to all sexual partners in the past year.

d

Responses on a 5-point scale, with 1, “the HIV-positive person has full responsibility,” to 5, “the HIV-negative person has full responsibility.”

e

Responses on a 4-point scale, with 1, strongly disagree, to 4, strongly agree.