Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 23;110(6):1185–1193. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs185

Table 2.

Karyological data and population cytotypes for the studied Sorbus taxa (for more detailed information about specimen localities and FCM results, see Supplementary Data Table S1)

Taxon 2n* Ploidy DNA ploidy No. of specimens No. of populations Ratio (mean ± s.d.)
S. admonitor M.Proctor approx. 68 4x 4x 4 1 3·172 ± 0·038
S. anglica Hedl. 51, 68 3x, 4x 4x 16 10 2·960 ± 0·038
S. aria (L.) Crantz 34 2x 2x 82 25 1·490 ± 0·017
S. cf. aria 3x 14 7 2·270 ± 0·028
S. aucuparia L. 34 2x 2x 13 10 1·522 ± 0·011
S. bristoliensis Wilmott 51 3x 3x 1 1 2·318
S. cambrensis M.Proctor 68 4x 5x 13 3 3·737 ± 0·050
S. cheddarensis L.Houston & Ashley Robertson 3x§ 3x 5 2 2·264 ± 0·018
S. cf. cheddarensis 3x 15 4 2·265 ± 0·022
S. cuneifolia T.C.G.Rich 4x 1 1 2·963
S. devoniensis E.F.Warb. 68 4x 4x 6 3 3·151 ± 0·033
S. eminens E.F.Warb. 68 4x 4x 32 8 3·029 ± 0·018
S. cf. eminens 4x 3 2 3·028 ± 0·016
S. eminentiformis T.C.G.Rich 68 4x 4x 10 3 3·009 ± 0·027
S. eminentoides L.Houston 4x§ 4x 5 1 3·002 ± 0·030
S. cf. eminentoides 4x 5 1 3·017 ± 0·020
S. hybrida L. 68 4x 4x 2 1 2·946 ± 0·053
S. intermedia (Ehrh.) Pers. 68 4x 4x 4 3 3·018 ± 0·054
S. lancastriensis E.F.Warb. 68 4x 4x 10 4 3·000 ± 0·029
S. latifolia (Lam.) Pers. 34, 68 2x, 4x 4x 1 1 3·143
S. leighensis T.C.G.Rich 3x§ 3x 2 2 2·296 ± 0·000
S. leptophylla E.F.Warb. 68 4x 4x 5 1 3·007 ± 0·049
S. leyana Wilmott 51 3x 3x 4 1 2·265 ± 0·013
S. margaretae M.Proctor 68 4x 4x 6 4 3·014 ± 0·036
S. minima (Ley) Hedl. 51 3x 3x 4 1 2·275 ± 0·015
S. mougeotii Soy.-Will. & Godr. 68 4x 4x 5 3 3·018 ± 0·046
S. ‘Observatory Hill taxon’ 3x 12 1 2·255 ± 0·018
S. parviloba T.C.G.Rich 4x 1 1 3·011
S. cf. parviloba 3x 2 1 2·248 ± 0·004
S. porrigentiformis E.F.Warb. (s.s.) 68 4x 4x 23 9 3·018 ± 0·030
S. porrigentiformis (agg.) 4x 5 7 3·011 ± 0·015
S. porrigentiformis ‘Symonds Yat clone’ 3x 11 3 2·269 ± 0·017
S. cf. porrigentiformis 5x 1 1 3·807
S. ‘Portishead taxon’ 4x 19 4 3·016 ± 0·029
S. rupicola (Syme) Hedl. 68 4x 4x 10 4 3·068 ± 0·024
S. rupicoloides L.Houston 4x 3 1 3·013 ± 0·013
S. saxicola T.C.G.Rich 3x 3 1 2·247 ± 0·004
S. stenophylla M.Proctor 5x 5 2 3·696 ± 0·027
S. subcuneata Wilmott 51, approx. 68 3x, 4x 3x 12 7 2·346 ± 0·028
S. torminalis (L.) Crantz 34 2x 2x 14 7 1·612 ± 0·011
S. vexans E.F.Warb. 68 4x 4x 5 3 3·024 ± 0·030
S. wilmottiana E.F.Warb. 51 3x 3x 1 1 2·278
S. cf. wilmottiana 3x 1 1 2·275

* Chromosome numbers extracted from Rich et al. (2010) and the Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers (IPCN electronic database; http://www.tropicos.org/Project/IPCN).

Ploidy inferred by FCM.

Fluorescence intensity ratio (target sample peak/internal standard peak) = relative DNA content.

§ Ploidy inferred from molecular data (Houston et al., 2009; Rich et al., 2010; Robertson et al., 2010).