Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 22;7(10):e46302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046302

Table 2. Comparison of the two encoding schemes on the training dataset.

Site Encoding scheme Sn (%) Sp (%) Ac (%) Mcc
S Binary 80.37±0.69 84.89±0.73 82.63±0.61 0.653±0.012
CKSAAP_PhSite 84.81±0.52 86.07±0.56 85.43±0.82 0.709±0.005
T Binary 60.05±0.95 90.17±0.64 75.12±0.53 0.528±0.008
CKSAAP_PhSite 78.59±0.51 82.26±0.86 80.31±0.62 0.599±0.015
Y Binary 65.07±1.09 81.36±1.06 73.15±0.87 0.471±0.017
CKSAAP_PhSite 74.44±0.74 78.03±0.21 76.21±0.32 0.524±0.006