Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Immunol. 2012 Aug 16;73(11):1082–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.07.328

Table 1.

Statistical analysis of serological responses after smallpox vaccination

Days after Smallpox Vaccination Average Percent Changea Unadjusted P valueb Significance Thresholdc Significant?
7 6 (−4, 13) 0.18 0.010 No
14 8 (4, 14) 0.03 0.006 No
21 7 (2, 13) 0.07 0.007 No
33 7 (2, 8) 0.03 0.006 No
63 −2 (−16, 8) 0.75 0.050 No
125 6 (−3, 11) 0.18 0.008 No
181 4 (−7, 14) 0.45 0.017 No
287 2 (−10, 6) 0.66 0.025 No
371 5 (−3, 5) 0.26 0.013 No
a

The average percent change from baseline values to the indicated time points after smallpox vaccination were determined for up to eight unrelated antibody titers in four subjects. The data are based on 30 individual ELISA measurements performed at each time point and the range in average percent change per individual is shown in parentheses.

b

Unadjusted P values were calculated by Student’s t-test prior to adjustment for multiple testing.

c

In these studies, independent analyses were collectively performed to test a single hypothesis (i.e., change in pre-existing antibody level from baseline due to smallpox vaccination) and therefore multiple testing correction is required[9]. Multiple test significance thresholds were calculated using the Holm procedure and were based on an experimentwise α = 0.05 as described previously [1]. Data was ranked by the significance threshold and then placed in the table according to the time after smallpox vaccination. For comparison, a statistically significant value after the Bonferroni correction would be a P value of <0.006.