Table 1.
Male target student |
Female target student |
||||||||
Male faculty |
Female faculty |
Male faculty |
Female faculty |
||||||
Variable | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | d |
Competence | 4.01a | (0.92) | 4.1a | (1.19) | 3.33b | (1.07) | 3.32b | (1.10) | 0.71 |
Hireability | 3.74a | (1.24) | 3.92a | (1.27) | 2.96b | (1.13) | 2.84b | (0.84) | 0.75 |
Mentoring | 4.74a | (1.11) | 4.73a | (1.31) | 4.00b | (1.21) | 3.91b | (0.91) | 0.67 |
Salary | 30,520.83a | (5,764.86) | 29,333.33a | (4,952.15) | 27,111,11b | (6,948.58) | 25,000.00b | (7,965.56) | 0.60 |
Scales for competence, hireability, and mentoring range from 1 to 7, with higher numbers reflecting a greater extent of each variable. The scale for salary conferral ranges from $15,000 to $50,000. Means with different subscripts within each row differ significantly (P < 0.05). Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) represent target student gender differences (no faculty gender differences were significant, all P > 0.14). Positive effect sizes favor male students. Conventional small, medium, and large effect sizes for d are 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80, respectively (51). nmale student condition = 63, nfemale student condition = 64. ***P < 0.001.