Table 4.
Respondents (n) reaching a certain/given proportion of segments matching the ideal case for interventions A-C
| A) Self assessmentIdeal case:M1-3 or M1-3a1 | Sequence I (n = 42) | Sequence II (n = 38) | TOT% (n = 80) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case |
9 |
16 |
31 |
| ≥50% to <70% of segments correspond with ideal case |
26 |
19 |
57 |
| ≥20% to <50% of segments correspond with ideal case |
6 |
2 |
10 |
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case |
1 |
1 |
2,5 |
|
B) Peer reviewIdeal case: M5-8 or M5-8a1 | |||
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case |
0 |
2 |
2,5 |
| ≥50% to <70% of segments correspond with ideal case |
3 |
2 |
6 |
| ≥20% to <50% of segments correspond with ideal case |
16 |
10 |
32,5 |
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case |
23 |
24 |
59 |
|
C) Written feedback/Signing contract/ Planning actionIdeal case: M5-8 or M5-8a1 | |||
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case |
0 |
8 |
10 |
| ≥50% to <70% the segments correspond with ideal case |
13 |
11 |
30 |
| ≥20% to <50% the segments correspond with ideal case |
18 |
11 |
36 |
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case | 11 | 8 | 24 |