Table 4.
Respondents (n) reaching a certain/given proportion of segments matching the ideal case for interventions A-C
| A) Self assessmentIdeal case:M1-3 or M1-3a1 | Sequence I (n = 42) | Sequence II (n = 38) | TOT% (n = 80) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case | 9 | 16 | 31 | 
| ≥50% to <70% of segments correspond with ideal case | 26 | 19 | 57 | 
| ≥20% to <50% of segments correspond with ideal case | 6 | 2 | 10 | 
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case | 1 | 1 | 2,5 | 
| B) Peer reviewIdeal case: M5-8 or M5-8a1 | |||
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case | 0 | 2 | 2,5 | 
| ≥50% to <70% of segments correspond with ideal case | 3 | 2 | 6 | 
| ≥20% to <50% of segments correspond with ideal case | 16 | 10 | 32,5 | 
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case | 23 | 24 | 59 | 
| C) Written feedback/Signing contract/ Planning actionIdeal case: M5-8 or M5-8a1 | |||
| ≥70% of segments correspond with ideal case | 0 | 8 | 10 | 
| ≥50% to <70% the segments correspond with ideal case | 13 | 11 | 30 | 
| ≥20% to <50% the segments correspond with ideal case | 18 | 11 | 36 | 
| < 20% of segments correspond with ideal case | 11 | 8 | 24 |