Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Brain. 2009 Apr 3;132(Pt 5):1376–1385. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp054

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the Parkinson’s disease patients with and without pathological gambling

Parkinson’s disease patients with pathological gambling (n = 7) Parkinson’s disease patients without pathological gambling (n = 7) P-value
Gender Five males, two females Six males, one female
Age 47–72 years 51–74 years 0.5
H & Y, mean (±SD) 2 (±0.6) 1.9 (±0.7) 0.6
PDRS (III), mean (±SD), off medication 25.2 (±4.5) 20.2 (±5.4) 0.09
Disease duration, mean years (±SD) 7.4 (±3.2) 5.6 (±2.5) 0.15
Current Total LEDD, mean (±SD) 856 (±407) mg 756 (± 400) mg 0.6
Current Dopamine agonist LEDD, mean (±SD) 138 (±172) mg 167 (±113) mg 0.7
MoCA, mean (±SD) 26 (±3.2) 28 (±2.3) 0.2
G-SAS, mean (±SD) 34.8 (±5.6) 4.6 (±6.3) <0.001

H & Y = Hoehn and Yahr; UPDRS III = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, motor score; LEDD = levodopa equivalent daily dose: L-dopa dose + L-dopa dose × 1/3 if on entacapone + bromocriptine (mg) × 10 + cabergoline or pramipexole (mg) × 67 + ropinirole (mg) × 20 + pergolide (mg) × 100 + apomorphine (mg) × 8 (from Evans et al., 2004); MocA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment; G-SAS = Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale.