Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Res. 2012 Aug 13;32(9):659–668. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.07.001

Table 4.

Summary of regression output for Purpose Two (n = 328 fourth-grade children and 1,178 meals) with body mass index (BMI) as the dependent variable, and Pearson correlations for five of the six aspects of school-provided mealsa.

Pearson correlationsb
Independent variables Regression estimatec (p-value) Amounts eaten of standardized school-meal portions Energy content given in food trades Energy intake received in food trades Energy intake from flavored milk Energy intake from a la carte ice cream
Amounts eaten of standardized school- meal portions 2.9786 (<0.0001) 1.00 −0.15 0.42 0.07 −0.15
Energy content given in food trades −0.0104 (0.0052) -- 1.00 0.12 −0.08 0.08
Energy intake received in food trades −0.0143 (0.1366) -- -- 1.00 0.04 −0.14
Energy intake from flavored milk 0.0064 (0.5335) -- -- -- 1.00 −0.18
Energy intake from a la carte ice cream −0.0177 (0.2937) -- -- -- -- 1.00
Breakfast type −0.4326 (0.1529)
Sexd 1.0605 (0.0223)
Racee 1.8760 (0.0021)
Age 0.0523 (0.0669)
Study χ2 = 2.75 (0.4320)
a

The six aspects of school-provided meals are defined in Table 2 footnotes b through g. Daily energy intake at school-provided meals was analyzed in units of 100 kilocalories for ease of interpretation.

b

Pearson correlations assess bivariate relationships between any two of five meal aspects with breakfast type excluded because it is binary (hot, cold).

c

Regression estimates are in kg/m2. The level of significance assumed for each individual regression estimate is 0.05. A Bonferroni-adjusted level of significance is 0.005 (0.05/10).

d

Female children were coded as 1, and male children were coded as 0.

e

Black children were coded as 1, and White children were coded as 0.