Table 2.

King County restaurant environments before nutrition-labeling regulation to soon after and 1.5 years later

	Wave 1		Wave 2		Wave 3
							Time
							p-
NEMS-R scale	M	95% CI	M	95% CI	M	95% CI	value	Contrasts
Availability of Healthful
Options	5.96	4.80, 7.12	6.3	5.14, 7.46	5.85	4.82, 6.89	NS
								Wave 2, Wave 3 >
Facilitators of Healthy								Wave 1, both
Eating	2.62	2.10, 3.14	3.79	3.40, 4.18	3.98	3.73, 4.23	<0.001	p<0.001
Facilitators of Healthy
Eating (without nutrition-
labeling items)	1.51	1.06, 1.96	1.53	1.10, 1.96	1.57	1.30, 1.85	NS
								Wave 2 < Wave 1,
								p=0.018; Wave 3 <
Barriers to Healthful Eating	−2.11	−2.48, −1.74	−1.68	−1.97, −1.39	−1.53	−1.81 to −1.26	0.003	Wave 1, p=0.001
								Wave 2, Wave 3 >
								Wave 1, both
Kid's menu	0.92	0.53, 1.30	2.04	1.43, 2.65	2.49	1.84, 3.14	<0.001	p<0.001
								Wave 2 > Wave 1,
Kid's Menu (without								p=0.023; Wave 3 >
nutrition-labeling items)	0.92	0.53, 1.30	1.38	0.86, 1.90	1.66	1.06, 2.26	0.016	Wave 1, p=0.004

Note. n= the same 47 restaurants across all waves

NS, not significant