Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 4;109(42):16786–16793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204945109

Table 1.

Number of transcripts differentially expressed

Effect ANOVA ANCOVA I ANCOVA II
Malaria
 Parasite load 2,971 3,014 1,990
 Cases:controls 3,334 3,177 3,154
 High parasitemia:control 4,852 4,402 4,085
 Low parasitemia:control 2,493 2,438 2,377
 High parasitemia:low parasitemia 2,772 2,601 2,078
 Three-way comparison 6,178 5,856 5,180
Location
 Village:city 1,089 310 30
Sex
 Female:male 40 48 43

All contrasts shown in this table are from analyses performed on the cases and controls combined dataset (155 individuals), except the parasite load effect, which was estimated by analyzing the 94 cases alone. ANOVA accounts for the infection status effect, sex, location, hemoglobin genotype and pair-wise interactions. ANCOVA I and ANCOVA II additionally account for total blood cell counts and significant gPCs (gPC1-3; Tracy–Widom statistic < 0.01), respectively. The FDR was evaluated by using the Benjamini and Hochberg method.