Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2012 Oct 3;57(21):6827–6848. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/6827

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Comparison of the experimental 18F hot rod in-water phantom reconstructed with the ray-tracing OSEM-2D (left), iso-Gaussian MOLAR (middle), and LOR-PDF MOLAR (right) protocols. The images were summed over 20mm in axial direction, the axial extent of the hot-rod section, to reduce statistical noise effects.