Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.032

Table 5.

Illustration of using the algorithms to estimate CRF from routinely collected clinical data

Men, %fat, five-level Women, BMI, two-level
Variable Value Regular weight Result Variable Value Regular weight Result
Constant 17.7357 Constant 14.7873
Age 50.0 0.1620 8.1 Age 40 0.1159 4.636
Age2 2500.0 −0.0021 −5.25 Age2 1600 0.0017 −2.72
%fat 20.0 −0.1057 −2.114 BMI 24 0.1534 −3.6816
Waist circumference 92.0 −0.0422 −3.8824 Waist circumference 70 0.0088 −0.616
Resting HR 60.0 −0.0363 −2.178 Resting HR 62 0.0364 −2.2568
PAI-1 0 0.2153 0 Active Yes 1 0.5987 0.5987
PAI-2 0 0.3655 0 Smoker Yes 0 −0.2994 0
PAI-3 1 0.8092 0.8092 Estimated CRF (METs) 10.7476
PAI-4 0 1.1989 0
Smoker yes 1 0.4378 −0.4378
Estimated CRF (METs) 2729.7851

Note: Provided is the %fat, five physical activity algorithm for men and the BMI, and two-level algorithm for women. The values for the clinical data were arbitrarily selected. To estimate CRF with a given algorithm, first multiply the patient’s clinical value by the model’s regression weight, and second, sum the obtained results with the algorithm’s constant.

CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness; HR, heart rate; PAI, physical activity index; %fat, percentage fat