1. Identifying project participants |
— weak or absent existing property rights (land tenure) |
— rules are devised and managed by resource users |
2. Channelling benefits to community |
— weak enforcement of community-based management schemes |
3. Connections and communications between multi-level institutions/actors |
— insufficient existing institutional infrastructure and communications (e.g. from project to extension services, or weak financial services at local level) |
— compliance with rules is easy to monitor |
4. Following established monitoring procedures |
— uncertainties in use of appropriate carbon-monitoring tools |
— rules are devised and managed by resource users |
5. Securing behavioural change |
— participants' perceptions of the project (as having low benefits and high risk) based on limited information of associated livelihood benefits |
|