Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;14(11):1346–1356. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos245

Table 4.

Cox OS analysis of biological variables’ prognostic effect

Univariate Analysis
Multivariate Analysis
HR 95% CI P (2–sided Wald test) HR 95% CI P (2–sided Wald test)
1q gain (FISH) 0.554 0.202
 Yes vs no 1.4 (0.5, 4.4) 2.0 (0.7, 5.8)
Nucleolin (IHC, % positive cells) 0.130 0.539
 >50% vs ≤50% 2.1 (0.8, 5.6) 1.3 (0.6, 2.6)
EGFR (IHC) 0.340 0.714
 Low vs strong 1.7 (0.6, 5.2) 1.2 (0.5, 2.5)
EGFR (mRNA)* 0.328 0.377
 10.1 vs 5.1 1.6 (0.9, 2.8) 1.4 (0.8, 2.4)
 32.7 vs 5.1 3.2 (0.7, 14.6) 2.6 (0.7, 9.8)
PROM1 (mRNA)* 0.993 0.967
 53.5 vs 26.8 1.0 (0.5, 1.9) 0.9 (0.5, 1.9)
 80.9 vs 26.8 1.0 (0.4, 2.3) 0.9 (0.4, 2.2)
HTERT (mRNA)* 0.024 0.011
 6.2 vs 1.2 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3)
 33.5 vs 1.2 7.1 (1.7, 29.2) 9.9 (2.2, 44.3)

*The 3 values are the quartiles of the variable distribution.