. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 24.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):608–615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019

Table 2.

Patient outcomes, CHOICE versus control program, n(%) unless otherwise indicated

Patient Outcome	CHOICE (n=132)	Control (n=132)	Unadjusted OR		AOR
Patient Outcome	CHOICE (n=132)	Control (n=132)	(95% CI)	p-value	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Reported a test preference after program	110 (84)	72 (55)	4.3 (2.4, 7.7)	<0.0001	5.3 (2.8, 10.1)^a	<0.0001
Increased readiness for screening after program^b	38 (52)	12 (20)	4.4 (2.0, 9.7)	<0.001	4.7 (1.9, 11.9)^c	0.001
Had screening test ordered at first visit	40 (30)	28 (21)	1.6 (0.92, 2.8)	0.09	1.6 (0.97, 2.8)^a	0.07
Completed screening test within 24 weeks	25 (19)	18 (14)	1.5 (0.76, 2.9)	0.25	1.7 (0.88, 3.2)^a	0.12

Adjusted for marital status (married/living together vs other), health insurance (yes/no), literacy level, baseline readiness stage, and provider training level (resident physician vs attending/mid-level provider).

Analysis limited to participants in the precontemplation or contemplation stages at baseline (73 in CHOICE, 61 in Control)

Adjusted for marital status (married/living together vs other); health insurance (yes/no); literacy level; race (black vs other); annual household income (<$20,000 vs ≥$20,000); and employment status (employed vs other)