Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 24;345:e6717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6717

Table 2.

 Effects of different ways of handling non-evaluable results on pooled diagnostic accuracy values

Basis for calculation Mean sensitivity (95% CI) Mean specificity (95% CI) Area under the curve (95% CI) Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI) Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)
2×2 table (non-evaluable results excluded) 98.2 (96.7 to 99.1)* 89.2 (84.2 to 92.8) 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00)* 9.1 (6.2 to 13.3)* 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04)*
Non-evaluable patients considered as positive 98.3 (96.9 to 99.0)* 78.4 (71.6 to 84.0) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99)* 4.5 (3.5 to 6.0) 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04)*
Non-evaluable patients considered as negative 92.9 (88.8 to 95.5) 90.5 (86.8 to 93.2)* 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) 9.8 (7.0 to 13.7)* 0.08 (0.05 to 0.13)
3×2 table (intention to diagnose approach) 92.7 (88.5 to 95.3) 79.0 (72.3 to 84.4) 0.93 (0.91 to 0.95) 4.4 (3.3 to 6.0) 0.09 (0.06 to 0.15)

*Significantly different (P<0.05) from data obtained by use of 3×2 table.