Table 2.
Effects of different ways of handling non-evaluable results on pooled diagnostic accuracy values
| Basis for calculation | Mean sensitivity (95% CI) | Mean specificity (95% CI) | Area under the curve (95% CI) | Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI) | Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2×2 table (non-evaluable results excluded) | 98.2 (96.7 to 99.1)* | 89.2 (84.2 to 92.8) | 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00)* | 9.1 (6.2 to 13.3)* | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04)* |
| Non-evaluable patients considered as positive | 98.3 (96.9 to 99.0)* | 78.4 (71.6 to 84.0) | 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99)* | 4.5 (3.5 to 6.0) | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04)* |
| Non-evaluable patients considered as negative | 92.9 (88.8 to 95.5) | 90.5 (86.8 to 93.2)* | 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) | 9.8 (7.0 to 13.7)* | 0.08 (0.05 to 0.13) |
| 3×2 table (intention to diagnose approach) | 92.7 (88.5 to 95.3) | 79.0 (72.3 to 84.4) | 0.93 (0.91 to 0.95) | 4.4 (3.3 to 6.0) | 0.09 (0.06 to 0.15) |
*Significantly different (P<0.05) from data obtained by use of 3×2 table.