Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 25;3:320. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00320

Table 1.

Elastic net regression analyses of gene–gene interaction between the HT and LT-T1D groups.

ARG1 CD19 CD3G CTLA4 CD11b CD20 S100A10 S100A11 S100A13 S100A6 S100A8 S100A9 TLR9
ARG1 0 0 0.07 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.22* 0.01 -0.21* 0
CD19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CD3G 0 0 0 0.21* 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0
CTLA4 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0
CD11b 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0
CD20 0 0 0 0.04 0 0 -0.15 0
S100A10 0 0 -0.05 0 0 0 0.11
S100A11 0 0 0 0 0 0
S100A13 -0.62** 0.09 0 -0.11 0.01
S100A6 0 0 0 0
S100A8 0 0 0
S100A9 0 0
TLR9 0

For a cross-group analysis of gene expression and interaction, gene expression data were fitted to a penalized logistic regression model named elastic net, according to an algorithm described in the text. Numbers in the table are the regression coefficients obtained from the analysis for healthy controls (HT) versus the long-term (LT)T1D group.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.0005.This approach of multiple penalized regression did not detect any gene–gene interaction between HT versus AT, or HT versus NO groups.