Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jul 6;52(7):1821–1832. doi: 10.1021/ci3000997

Table 3.

Filtering by ligand stability during equilibration MD and FEP/MD calculations to predict ligand-binding modea

System Cognate docking
Noncognate docking
RMSDnat docking score RMSDMD
ΔGb
RMSDnat docking score RMSDMD
ΔGb
T-1 6.73 −5.5 4.27 7.99 −6.2 1.95 −11.53 ± 2.38
6.94 −6.5 2.29 1.28 −7.3 1.50 −12.54 ± 1.88
6.41 −6.3 3.27 6.18 −7.3 2.46
0.85 −8.2 1.43 −12.04 ± 2.13 2.31 −6.7 1.76 −7.95 ± 0.47
2.18 −7.5 2.00 −9.08 ± 3.99 6.69 −5.1 4.80



T-2 4.54 −7.5 2.51 4.83 −7.4 1.75 −15.43 ± 1.09
5.88 −6.5 6.75 1.89 −8.0 1.07 −18.51 ± 1.40
6.10 −6.9 1.35 −20.30 ± 2.43 7.09 −6.1 7.54
0.81 −9.7 1.69 −23.25 ± 1.35 5.73 −6.5 6.94
5.86 −8.1 2.69 6.19 −7.3 1.26 −12.73 ± 2.02



T-3 7.25 −7.8 2.37 6.08 −7.1 2.41
7.78 −7.2 1.55 −6.29 ± 1.89 5.35 −7.2 2.79
7.15 −7.2 3.76 1.21 −8.9 0.91 −14.19 ± 1.62
0.20 −9.4 0.74 −18.95 ± 1.60 5.95 −7.9 1.13 −10.38 ± 1.52
6.09 −8.8 1.26 −8.17 ± 3.09 4.93 −7.6 1.66 −4.82 ± 1.47



T-4 5.68 −7.9 4.63 5.49 −8.4 2.98
5.41 −8.2 1.06 −16.38 ± 2.23 6.89 −7.0 1.62 −3.72 ± 2.02
6.08 −7.9 2.51 6.76 −7.4 4.64
0.59 −8.6 0.89 −15.88 ± 0.52 0.68 −8.2 1.55 −16.41 ± 1.97
5.14 −7.9 1.45 −9.57 ± 1.16 4.93 −7.5 3.20



X-1 8.11 −7.7 2.07 6.08 −6.1 3.18
7.04 −6.6 1.72 −9.36 ± 2.48 7.05 −6.6 3.75
0.48 −6.9 1.33 −9.78 ± 2.12 5.36 −6.3 2.21
6.17 −6.4 4.99 4.46 −6.4 1.92 −4.93 ± 2.77
7.55 −7.0 3.05 6.95 −6.4 4.48
a

RMSDnat (Å): RMSD of a docked ligand from its native pose, docking score (kcal/mol): binding affinity predicted by AutoDock Vina. RMSDMD (Å): average ligand RMSD from the initial docked pose during the last 100-ps equilibration MD, ΔGb