Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 7;3(4):411–418. doi: 10.1007/s13244-012-0178-8

Table 2.

PGIC results for postal patients (responders) and telephone patients (non-responders)

Baseline data and outcomes Responders (postal) Non-responders (telephone)
PGIC improved (1 and 2) 33 % 49 %
PGIC worse (5, 6 and 7) 15 % 4 % p = 0.02
 Slightly worse (5) 8 % 4 %
 Worse (6) 5 % 0 %
 Much worse (7) 2 % 0 %