Table 1.
Comparison of the spinopelvic parameters
| DS total (n = 50) | Non-DS total (n = 50) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Comparison of the spinopelvic parameters between the DS and non-DS group in all the subjects | |||
| PI | 57.5 ± 10.7° | 48.8 ± 9.7° | <0.001 |
| SS | 34.0 ± 9.9° | 26.6 ± 7.0° | <0.001 |
| PT | 23.5 ± 6.2° | 22.2 ± 9.5° | 0.427 |
| TK | 37.2 ± 11.2° | 30.5 ± 9.7° | 0.002 |
| LL | 47.4 ± 16.5° | 35.5 ± 8.9° | <0.001 |
| HAC7PL | 15.3 ± 32.9 mm | 15.3 ± 29.2 mm | 0.995 |
| L5 slope | 17.8 ± 7.3° | 9.4 ± 5.6° | <0.001 |
| L4 slope | 7.8 ± 5.5° | 2.7 ± 5.3° | <0.001 |
| DS male (n = 25) | Non-DS male (n = 25) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (b) Comparison of the spinopelvic parameters between the DS and non-DS group in males | |||
| PI | 57.8 ± 11.7° | 48.0 ± 8.6° | 0.002 |
| SS | 34.9 ± 9.8° | 28.6 ± 7.6° | 0.015 |
| PT | 22.9 ± 6.5° | 19.4 ± 8.2° | 0.1 |
| TK | 38.7 ± 8.9° | 32.6 ± 9.3° | 0.022 |
| LL | 48.1 ± 15.6° | 38.0 ± 8.2° | 0.006 |
| HAC7PL | 11.0 ± 29.6 mm | 9.7 ± 26.9 mm | 0.866 |
| L5 slope | 17.8 ± 7.3° | 9.4 ± 5.6° | <0.001 |
| L4 slope | 7.6 ± 6.0° | 2.4 ± 4.9° | 0.002 |
| DS female (n = 25) | Non-DS female (n = 25) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (c) Comparison of the spinopelvic parameters between the DS and non-DS group in females | |||
| PI | 57.2 ± 9.8° | 49.5 ± 10.7° | 0.011 |
| SS | 33.1 ± 10.0° | 24.5 ± 5.7° | 0.001 |
| PT | 24.0 ± 6.0° | 25.0 ± 10.0° | 0.683 |
| TK | 35.6 ± 13.2° | 28.3 ± 9.9° | 0.03 |
| LL | 46.7 ± 17.6° | 33.0 ± 9.1° | 0.001 |
| HAC7PL | 19.5 ± 36.0 mm | 21.0 ± 30.8 mm | 0.88 |
| L5 slope | 18.7 ± 8.3° | 9.2 ± 5.6° | <0.001 |
| L4 slope | 8.0 ± 5.0° | 3.0 ± 5.7° | 0.002 |
mean ± standard deviation