Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 22;13:416. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-416

Table 1.

Comparison of original and new mono-nucleotide PWM

A)
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
25
0
61
0
39
15
T
20
0
1
58
19
8
G
4
62
1
5
4
37
C
14
1
0
0
1
3
A
0.40
0.0
0.97
0.0
0.62
0.24
T
0.32
0.0
0.02
0.92
0.30
0.17
G
0.06
0.98
0.02
0.08
0.06
0.59
C
0.22
0.02
0
0.0
0.02
0.05
A
0.00
-3.83
0.00
-4.12
0.00
-0.55
T
-0.021
-3.82
-4.10
0.00
-0.79
-1.16
G
-2.19
0.00
-4.47
-2.81
-2.63
0.00
C
-0.92
-4.11
-4.51
-4.47
-4.10
-2.50
 
a/t
G
A
T
A
g/a
B)
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
27
0
66
0
43
16
T
22
0
1
63
20
8
G
4
67
1
5
4
41
C
15
1
0
0
1
3
A
0.40
0.0
0.97
0.0
0.63
0.24
T
0.32
0.0
0.01
0.93
0.29
0.12
G
0.06
0.99
0.01
0.07
0.07
0.62
C
0.22
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.01
0.04
A
0.00
-3.83
0.00
-4.13
0.00
-0.59
T
-0.19
-3.82
-3.48
0.00
-0.76
-1.27
G
-2.26
0.00
-3.84
-2.9
-2.73
0.00
C
-0.93
-3.49
-4.52
-4.48
-3.4
-2.61
  a/t G A T A g/a