Table 2.
RCTs | Adequate sequence generation? | Allocation concealment? | Blinding (of outcome assessors)? | Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Overall assessment of risk of bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Krugman et al19 | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Uncertain |
De Miranda et al20 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | High |
Stipancic et al21 | No | No | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Sorensen et al22 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Uncertain |
Simpson and Dryden23 | No | No | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Pre-post study designs | Reporting (10 items) | External validity (3 items) | Internal validity: bias & confounding (13 items) | Power (1 item) | Total score (27 items) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Einspruch and Forman24 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Timpany25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Konefal and Duncan26 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
Gray27 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
Bigley et al28 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
RCT = randomised controlled trial.