Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Cogn Psychol. 2012 May-June;26(3):462–474. doi: 10.1002/acp.2832

Table 2.

Mean number of patients treated and familiarity ratings for disorder categories across experience

Clinicians in area of specialization Clinicians out of area of specialization Trainee
No. of patients seen
 Anorexia nervosa 238* (318) 19.8* (31) 0.50 (1.1)
 Alcohol abuse 386* (433) 55.1* (63) 1.95 (3.0)
 Eating disorders 477* (509) 35.2* (50) 1.90 (3.3)
 Substance abuse disorders 511* (440) 72.5* (75) 5.25 (8.5)
 Average specific 312.1** (378) 37.5 (51) 1.23 (3.6)
 Average general 493.6** (463) 53.9 (65) 3.58 (4.6)
Familiarity: scale 0 (not familiar at all) to 10 (extremely familiar)
 Anorexia nervosa 9.55* (0.69) 3.4 (2.4) 5.28 (2.4)
 Alcohol abuse 9.90* (0.32) 5.91 (1.2) 5.30 (2.4)
 Eating disorders 9.73* (0.47) 4.10 (2.3) 5.35 (2.3)
 Substance abuse disorders 9.60* (0.97) 5.82 (1.3) 5.10 (2.5)
 Average specific 9.71** (0.56) 4.71 (2.2) 5.29 (1.8)
 Average general 9.67** (0.73) 5.00 (2.0) 5.23 (1.7)

Note: Numbers in parentheses represent standard deviations. Patient load of clinicians may be underestimated. Many clinicians reported the number of patients in their area of expertise as ‘hundreds’ or ‘thousands’. Conservative versions of these types of estimates were used such that an estimate of ‘hundreds’ was recorded as 100 and estimates of ‘thousands’ were recorded as 1000.

*

Significant difference between the clinician group and trainee group (ps < .01).

**

Significant difference between in-area and out-of-area clinicians (ps < .005).