Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul 23;36(5):1222–1230. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23761

Table 3.

The signal-to-noise-ratio of the fat signal (peak at 1.3 ppm) presented as mean ± standard deviation for the ex-vivo, in-vivo and the phantom data. p less than 0.05 denotes significant difference in the 1.5-T and 3-T values.

Phantom Ex-vivo In-vivo
3T 969.2±1220.6 123.5±149.1 39.8±29.1
1.5T 521.7±494.1 85.5±133.1 16.7±13.5
p (1.5T vs. 3T) 0.312 <0.05 <0.05
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure