Table 2. ADC-based localization of retina/not-retina borders within the structurally-defined %thick scale. Values are shown as mean±SEM separately for dark (bold) and light (italic).

ADC location	Vitreoretinal border			Retina-Choroid border			Choroid-Sclera Border
	Local Max. (vitreous; μm2/ms)	Local Min. (retina; μm2/ms)	Location (%thick)	Local Max. (choroid; μm2/ms)	Local Min. (retina; μm2/ms)	Location (%thick)	Location (%thick)
ADC┴,0,250	2.54±0.12†	0.36±0.04‡	−7.5±1.3**	1.88±0.10*	1.08±0.14a	-	-
	2.22±0.14†	0.34±0.08‡	−2.7±1.9**	2.06±0.10*	1.06±0.12a
ADC║,0,250	2.06±0.22†	0.43±0.07‡	−3.3±2.6**	1.73±0.19*	0.56±0.09a	-	-
	2.18±0.14†	0.40±0.12‡	−2.8±1.8**	1.46±0.14*	0.66±0.11a
ADC┴,0,250 - ADC║,0,250	-	-	-	1.44±0.16	−0.33±0.10	87.5±3.4b	113.9±4.1c
	-	-	-	1.45±0.15	0.02±0.20	83.4±3.5b	108.3±4.0c

† Consistent with the literature value for rat vitreous, 2.3±0.4 μm²/ms [13] Statistically similar value in all four cases (two-way repeated measures ANOVA; F [_1,7] <3.20 and p>0.11 for both main effects and interaction). ‡ Statistically similar value in all four cases (two-way repeated measures ANOVA; F [_1,7] <3.20 and p>0.056 for both main effects and interaction). ** Statistically similar location in all four cases (two-way repeated measures ANOVA; F [_1,7] <0.56 and p>0.47 for both main effects and interaction). * A main effect of direction (┴ > ║; F [_1,7]=9.76, p=0.017), but neither a significant effect of dark versus light nor an interaction (F [_1,7] <3.99 and p>0.085) was found with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. ^aA main effect of direction (┴ > ║; F [_1,7]=9.90, p=0.016), but neither a significant effect of dark versus light nor an interaction (F [_1,7] <0.43 and p>0.53) was found with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. ^bStatistically similar location for light and dark data (p=0.41; paired two-tailed t test). ^cStatistically similar location for light and dark data (p=0.65; paired two-tailed t test).