Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2012 Nov;23(6):931–932. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826d0741

Table 1.

Identifiability and bounds on the causal risk difference CRDI(0). 3000 households of size 2 with individual 1 randomized to vaccine or control 1:1. In the 1500 households with Zi = (0, 0), individual 1 became infected in 1000, and individual 2 became infected in 400 of those, so p0 = 0.4. In the 1500 households with Zi = (1, 0), individual 1 became infected in 500, and individual 2 became infected in 100 of those, so p1 = 0.2. The 500 transmission units where individual 1 was randomized to vaccine and became infected must be in the doomed stratum. The 500 transmission units where individual 1 was randomized to control and was not infected must be in the immune stratum. Thus, ignoring sampling variability, the proportions in the three principal strata πi, πp, and πd all equal 1/3, and ρ = (1/3)/(2/3) = 0.5. The number of households with Yi1 = 1, Zi1 = 0 in which Yi2 = 1 is 400. It is not known which of these 400 households are in the doomed or protected stratum. The number assumed in the doomed stratum under different selection assumptions is denoted by x (eSection 2.1). If individual 1 does not become infected, then Yi2(zi1, zi2) is undefined and denoted by *.

Basic Principal Stratum Potential infection outcomes Yi1(zi)
Observed transmission outcomes Yi2obs=1
Selection assumptions
Yi2(zi)
Prop. (0,0) (1,0) (0,0) (1,0) (0,0) (0,0) (0,0)
no selection bias HH lower bound HH upper bound
Immune πi
0500
0500
* *
Protected πp
1500
0500
?400?
* 200 0 400
Doomed πd
1500
1500
100 x = 200 400 0
CRDI (0) −0.2 −0.6 0.2