Table 4.

Predicted log odds of condom use from perceived stigma, disengagement coping, and their interaction

	Inconsistent condoms versus no sex in the previous 90 days					Consistent condom use versus no sex in the previous 90 days					Consistent condom use versus inconsistent condom use
	β (SE)	OR	Wald	(95 % CI)	P value	β (SE)	OR	Wald	(95 % CI)	P value	β (SE)	OR	Wald	(95 % CI)	P value
Intercept	−0.70 (0.24)		8.66		0.003	−0.54 (0.23)		5.66		0.017	0.16 (0.26)		0.37		0.545
Sex (female = 1, male = 0)	−0.76 (0.50)	0.47	2.28	0.18–1.25	0.131	−0.03 (0.39)	0.96	0.01	0.45–2.07	0.925	0.72 (0.54)	2.05	1.77	0.71–5.91	0.183
Time since diagnosis	−0.06 (0.04)	0.94	2.79	0.88–1.01	0.095	−0.03 (0.03)	0.97	0.95	0.92–1.03	0.330	0.03 (.04)	1.03	.059	0.96–1.11	0.442
Category C symptoms	0.11 (0.11)	1.12	0.94	0.89–1.39	0.333	−0.12 (0.11)	0.89	1.12	0.72–1.10	0.276	−0.23 (0.13)	0.79	3.11	0.61–1.03	0.078
Enacted stigma	−0.08 (0.31)	0.93	0.06	0.51–1.70	0.805	−0.28 (0.26)	0.75	1.16	0.28–0.75	0.282	−0.21 (0.33)	0.81	0.40	0.43–1.54	0.527
Disengagement Coping	0.48 (0.35)	1.62	1.95	0.82–3.19	0.163	−0.04 (0.31)	0.96	0.02	0.52–1.77	0.901	−0.52 (0.38)	0.59	1.91	0.28–1.24	0.167
Enacted stigma by   disengagement coping   interaction	−1.27 (0.46)	0.28a	7.66	0.12–0.69	0.006	−0.92 (0.39)	−0.92a	5.47	0.19–0.86	0.019	0.35 (.49)	1.42a	0.50	0.54–3.72	0.481

^aThis represents a ratio of odds ratios