Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2014 May;52(5):e30–e38. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8c22

Table 3.

Performance of ICD-9 coding algorithms for a diagnosis of heart failure or cardiomyopathy at any time during the study period when compared to chart-review

AUTOMATED DATA HEART FAILURE EVENT DEFINITION
Algorithm #1
≥1 primary discharge dx
of HF/CM







N=43 (weighted N=5)
Algorithm #2
≥1 primary discharge
OR
≥3 secondary discharge
OR
≥2 outpatient OR
≥3 ED OR
≥2 secondary discharge
+ ≥1 outpatient diagnosis
of HF/CM
N=124 (weighted N=18)
Algorithm #3
Any ICD-9 code for
HF/CM







N=166 (weighted N=40)
(A) Clinical chart
diagnosis of heart
failure events
N=92 (weighted N=17)
Sens = 16.6 (5.3–41.4)
Spec = 99.5 (97.9–99.9)
PPV = 59.3 (19.2–89.9)
NPV =96.4 (94.0–97.8)
Sens = 68.0 (43.6–85.4)
Spec = 98.3 (96.3–99.2)
PPV = 63.9 (40.6–82.1)
NPV = 98.6 (96.7–99.4)
Sens = 93.0 (67.7–98.8)
Spec = 93.7 (90.8–95.8)
PPV = 40.0 (26.3–55.8)
NPV = 99.7 (98.0–99.9)
(B) LVEF <50%
N=52 (weighted N=8)
Sens = 20.6 (4.5–59.0)
Spec = 99.2 (97.6–99.7)
PPV = 34.1 (7.4–77.2)
NPV = 98.4 (96.5–99.3)
Sens = 55.8 (23.8–83.5)
Spec = 96.5 (94.1–97.9)
PPV = 24.3 (10.0–48.2)
NPV = 99.1 (97.4–99.7)
Sens = 79.6 (41.2–95.6)
Spec = 91.4 (88.2–93.8)
PPV = 15.9 (7.5–30.7)
NPV = 99.6 (97.9–99.9)
(C) Either A or B
(gold standard)
N=108 (weighted N=21)
Sens = 14.0 (4.5–36.2)
Spec = 99.5 (97.9–99.9)
PPV = 59.3 (19.2–89.9)
NPV =95.5 (93.0–97.2)
Sens = 61.5 (39.6–79.5)
Spec = 98.5 (96.6–99.3)
PPV = 68.6 (44.9–85.4)
NPV =97.9 (95.9–99.0)
Sens = 87.7 (65.6–96.4)
Spec = 94.2 (91.3–96.1)
PPV = 44.9 (30.5–60.3)
NPV = 99.3 (97.6–99.8)