Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 21;53(8):1088–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.05.003

Table 2. Hierarchical Regressions Examining Whether Interpersonal Dimensions Account for Variance in Developmental Trajectory Variables.

Age at First Binge

Mean (SD) Beta t AdjustedR2 R2 Change F Change
Step 1
Dominance −0.09 (0.67) 0.027 0.232 −0.013 0.001 0.054
Step 2 0.057 0.083 6.328*
Dom × Dom 0.45 (0.74) −0.313 −2.516*

Age at BED Onset

Step 1 −0.013 0.001 0.069
Dominance −0.06 (0.64) 0.031 0.262
Step 2 0.105 0.129 10.275**
Dom × Dom 0.41 (0.65) −0.378 −3.205**

Age at Diet Onset

Step 1 0.058 0.083 3.296*
Dominance −0.10 (0.67) 0.065 0.572
Affiliation 0.12 (0.60) −0.272 −2.409*

Age at Overweight Onset

Step 1 −0.004 0.011 0.750
Dominance −0.10 (0.69) 0.104 0.866
Step 2 0.044 0.060 4.416*
Dom × Dom 0.48 (0.76) −0.270 −2.102*

Note. Dom=dominant interpersonal style. Affil=affiliative interpersonal style. Dom × Dom=extremity on dominant dimension. Affil × Affil=extremity on affiliative dimension.

*

p≤0.05.

**

p≤0.01.