Table 1.
Study | n | Outcome | Method | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
Klitzman et al. [17] | 8 fresh frozen human ankles |
Syndesmotic gap Tibiofibular movement Laxity due to cycling |
Cycling at submaximal loads in six-degrees-of-freedom-machine Dorsal/plantar flexion; internal/external rotation and inversion/eversion |
Good alternative for syndesmotic fixation. More physiologic type of fixation and a good ability to maintain reduction in syndesmosis. No second surgery necessary |
Soin et al. [35] | Ten pairs of cadaveric legs | Fibular translations and rotation |
Axial compression, external rotation and combination Linear variable displacement transducer |
Screws were closer to native ankle motion in AP and ML motions; Suture-button was closer to native fibular rotation |
Forsythe et al. [10] | Ten fresh frozen cadaveric ankle pairs | Maintain syndesmotic reduction as compared to metallic screw | External rotation force on intact ankles and after dissecting the syndesmotic and deltoid ligaments | The fibre wire button was unable to maintain syndesmotic reduction in the ankle at any forces applied |
Thornes et al. [37] | Sixteen embalmed cadaveric legs | Diastasis in suture-button versus 4 cortical screw | Generating an external rotation torque | Suture-endobutton fixation at least equals the performance of screw fixation |
Miller et al. [22] | 26 formalin-preserved cadaveric legs | Maximum load and displacement at failure in suture constructs and tricortical screws | Tested to failure along the axis of the repair apparatus. Screw versus suture at 2 and 5 cm above tibial plafond | Good alternative to internal fixation of ankle mortise instability due to syndesmotic rupture |