Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 3;12:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-234

Table 3.

Multi-level logistic regression models for referral to the LMP

Explanatory variables   Empty model Model 1 1
Patient characteristics
 
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
SEIFA quintile2
1 - poorest
 
1.00 (reference)
 
2
 
9.87 (0.21, 471.1)
 
3
 
1.44 (0.12, 17.53)
 
4
 
3.36 (0.09, 122.4)
 
5 - richest
 
7.18 (0.33, 155.1)
BMI
<25
 
1.00 (reference)
 
≥25
 
2.87 (1.10, 7.47)
Physical activity
Active
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Inactive
 
2.90 (1.36, 6.14)
Stage of change for increasing fruit and vegetables
Maintenance
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Contemplation/preparation/action
 
0.70 (0.28, 1.78)
 
Pre-contemplation
 
0.61 (0.11, 3.49)
Stage of change for decreasing dietary fat intake
Maintenance
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Contemplation/preparation/action
 
1.56 (0.60, 4.05)
 
Pre-contemplation
 
2.88 (0.47, 17.71)
Stage of change for increasing physical activity
Maintenance
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Contemplation/preparation/action
 
2.75 (1.07, 7.03)
 
Pre-contemplation
 
0.83 (0.14, 4.79)
Stage of change for losing weight
Maintenance
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Contemplation/preparation/action
 
1.20 (0.41, 3.48)
 
Pre-contemplation
 
1.59 (0.46, 5.52)
GP advice/referral for physical activity in previous 3 months
No
 
1.00 (reference)
 
Yes
 
1.43 (0.68, 3.00)
Practice characteristics
 
 
 
Practice location
urban
 
1.00 (reference)
 
rural
 
12.50 (1.43, 109.7)
Practice size:
≥ 3 GPs
 
1.00 (reference)
 
1-3 GPs
 
16.05 (2.74, 94.24)
Between patient variance (SE3)
 
1.176 (0.852)
1.045 (0.627)
Intra class correlation
 
0.263
0.241
Explained variance 4 (%)   - 11.14

*P < 0.05.

Statistically significant p-values (<0.05) are shown in bold.

Multilevel logistic regression1 Model 1: includes all variables found to be significant in univariate analysis. 2 2006 index of relative socio-economic advantage/disadvantage, 3 Standard error, 4 Explained ‘between practice’ variance using the variance in the empty model as reference.